‘STEM Educators Advocates For Innovative Mindsets’

#1 · ,

Teach For Nigeria and a material science company, Dow, have said Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics teachers need to be innovative.

The duo in a statement said this would empower their learners with the skills and knowledge necessary to make meaningful contributions in an ever-evolving world.

It revealed that through collaboration, Dow and Teach For Nigeria sought an innovative mindset that would equip STEM educators with cutting-edge pedagogical tools and the necessary skills to train a ready, skilled, diverse, and robust workforce for STEM-related fields.

The statement revealed that the partnership would directly impact nine STEM teachers in nine schools across Lagos and Ogun states.

Managing Director, Dow West Africa, Adebisi Adeoti, said, “The aim of this partnership is to foster the development of students into future leaders, empowering them with the skills and knowledge necessary to make meaningful contributions in an ever-evolving world. To do this, we need to continue to support the education system.”

It explained that STEM teachers were in high need in schools in Nigeria as such, the partnership would support the recruitment, professional development, and placement of STEM teachers.

Teach For Nigeria CEO, Folawe Omikunle, expressed great enthusiasm about the partnership, stating, “We are excited to continue our collaboration with Dow in our collective effort to expand excellent education for all children in Nigeria. This partnership is critical in fostering the development of STEM skills in the students we serve, thereby equipping them to face future challenges while improving their life opportunities.”

#2 · ,

Interesting read and I love how it encourages creative thinking It actually reminded me of Infinite Craft where mixing ideas feels just as fun as building skills Thanks for the insight and the motivation to keep exploring new ways to learn

#3 · ,

Quote from jasontrout on ,
It’s funny how students will admit things in private that they’d never put on a syllabus. There’s this quiet rebellion in higher education, a tug-of-war between deadlines, sleep deprivation, and the need to look competent. And somewhere in the middle of it all, EssayPay has carved out a peculiar niche. Ask around campus, scroll through forums, and you start to see the patterns.

The first thing that strikes you is how candid students are when they talk about using online essay services. It’s not just laziness, though. In fact, many are downright strategic. A sophomore at NYU might be juggling a part-time job in a coffee shop, an internship at a startup, and five heavy classes that include Organic Chemistry and Comparative Literature. There’s no room to breathe. In those moments, outsourcing an essay feels less like cheating and more like survival.

It’s not all about convenience, either. Some students talk about quality — surprisingly so. “I can’t pull together an A-level research paper in two days,” one user posted on a student forum. “But someone else can, and it’s worth paying for the mental space.” That mental space is real. Think of the difference between staying up until 3 a.m. trying to synthesize hundreds of sources versus being able to focus on a project that actually matters to your future. EssayPay, in that sense, is a time-machine of cognitive bandwidth.

And here’s where it gets interesting. The demographics aren’t as uniform as you’d expect. It’s not just the flustered undergrads; even grad students wrestling with thesis chapters or PhD candidates stuck in literature review hell sometimes turn to these platforms. A glance at Google Trends over the past five years shows a steady uptick in searches like “custom essay help” or “pay someone to write my paper.” This isn’t a fad — it’s a structural response to the pressure cooker environment of modern education.

A brief, not-so-boring table might help illustrate the motivations:

Motivation Insight

Time Management Students juggling jobs, internships, social life

Quality Assurance Access to well-structured papers

Stress Reduction Avoiding burnout during heavy assignment periods

Learning Gap Supplemental material or examples

It’s tempting to judge, sure. Academics and parents will roll their eyes at the idea of “buying” your education. But here’s the thing: the reality of student life is messy. Students are not monoliths of laziness; they are human beings making trade-offs. Someone at the University of Michigan might spend 20 hours a week at a research lab, yet still need help with a 10-page essay due Monday. The ecosystem is not about morality, it’s about survival and strategic allocation of effort.

And let’s talk about the psychology. When students talk about EssayPay online, they often emphasize trust. The platform isn’t just a marketplace; it’s a system that feels reliable in an otherwise chaotic academic world. Deadlines don’t negotiate, grades don’t forgive, and mental health is always on the line. Paying for an essay is sometimes framed as a calculated investment in one’s overall performance and sanity.

Interestingly, cultural context matters, too. Students from countries with highly competitive education systems, like South Korea or India, often approach these services differently. It’s less about laziness and more about high-stakes optimization. In some European countries, where collaborative work and peer feedback are emphasized, students might use EssayPay to model structure and technique rather than outsourcing entirely. The nuances are subtle but telling.

Of course, no one denies the risks. There’s the moral tightrope, potential plagiarism issues, and a nagging feeling that the line between learning and outsourcing can blur. Yet the candid reflections you find in forums show a sophisticated calculus. A post from a London School of Economics student reads: “I use it to manage my workload, not to skip learning. I read everything before submission.” That subtle distinction is key — it’s not always black and white.

Even more revealing are the reflections about skill development. Some students claim that by studying the essays they purchase, they actually improve their own writing. It’s almost like using a personal tutor, except on demand and cheaper than tutoring services. That raises an eyebrow because it challenges conventional narratives: the service isn’t always the enemy of learning; sometimes it’s a scaffold.

And the conversation about ethics? That’s shifting, too. Professors are increasingly aware that students face pressures their syllabi never acknowledge. Discussions in academic conferences now sometimes touch on “academic outsourcing” as a coping mechanism rather than sheer laziness. A 2023 study from Stanford indicated that over 40% of undergraduates admitted to using some form of online writing assistance — and the conversation wasn’t scandalous; it was pragmatic.

So where does that leave us? There’s a paradox. Students crave authenticity in their work but also crave balance in their lives. EssayPay offers a negotiated solution: a way to reconcile high standards with human limits. It’s not perfect, and it shouldn’t be treated as a moral panacea, but its popularity is symptomatic of a larger reality — education, stress, and digital access collide in complex ways.

To wrap it up, consider this: a student at UCLA finishing an essay at 2 a.m., a full-time intern in San Francisco writing a report, and a philosophy major at Oxford juggling seminars — all are navigating pressures that traditional grading systems rarely accommodate. EssayPay, controversial though it is, becomes a mirror of those pressures. It’s less about the service itself and more about the ecosystem it reflects: one of time scarcity, mental health prioritization, and strategic thinking.

In the end, the conversation isn’t about cheating or morality. It’s about understanding why students make these choices and acknowledging that their reality is far more complicated than a simple A-F scale. And maybe, just maybe, by listening to them honestly, education can start to adapt instead of just judge.

It’s funny how students will admit things in private that they’d never put on a syllabus. There’s this quiet rebellion in higher education, a tug-of-war between deadlines, sleep deprivation, and the need to look competent. And somewhere in the middle of it all, EssayPay has carved out a peculiar niche. Ask around campus, scroll through forums, and you start to see the patterns.

The first thing that strikes you is how candid students are when they talk about using online essay services. It’s not just laziness, though. In fact, many are downright strategic. A sophomore at NYU might be juggling a part-time job in a coffee shop, an internship at a startup, and five heavy classes that include Organic Chemistry and Comparative Literature. There’s no room to breathe. In those moments, outsourcing an essay feels less like cheating and more like survival.

It’s not all about convenience, either. Some students talk about quality — surprisingly so. “I can’t pull together an A-level research paper in two days,” one user posted on a student forum. “But someone else can, and it’s worth paying for the mental space.” That mental space is real. Think of the difference between staying up until 3 a.m. trying to synthesize hundreds of sources versus being able to focus on a project that actually matters to your future. EssayPay, in that sense, is a time-machine of cognitive bandwidth.

And here’s where it gets interesting. The demographics aren’t as uniform as you’d expect. It’s not just the flustered undergrads; even grad students wrestling with thesis chapters or PhD candidates stuck in literature review hell sometimes turn to these platforms. A glance at Google Trends over the past five years shows a steady uptick in searches like “custom essay help” or “pay someone to write my paper.” This isn’t a fad — it’s a structural response to the pressure cooker environment of modern education.

A brief, not-so-boring table might help illustrate the motivations:

Motivation	Insight
Time Management	Students juggling jobs, internships, social life
Quality Assurance	Access to well-structured papers
Stress Reduction	Avoiding burnout during heavy assignment periods
Learning Gap	Supplemental material or examples

It’s tempting to judge, sure. Academics and parents will roll their eyes at the idea of “buying” your education. But here’s the thing: the reality of student life is messy. Students are not monoliths of laziness; they are human beings making trade-offs. Someone at the University of Michigan might spend 20 hours a week at a research lab, yet still need help with a 10-page essay due Monday. The ecosystem is not about morality, it’s about survival and strategic allocation of effort.

And let’s talk about the psychology. When students talk about EssayPay online, they often emphasize trust. The platform isn’t just a marketplace; it’s a system that feels reliable in an otherwise chaotic academic world. Deadlines don’t negotiate, grades don’t forgive, and mental health is always on the line. Paying for an essay is sometimes framed as a calculated investment in one’s overall performance and sanity.

Interestingly, cultural context matters, too. Students from countries with highly competitive education systems, like South Korea or India, often approach these services differently. It’s less about laziness and more about high-stakes optimization. In some European countries, where collaborative work and peer feedback are emphasized, students might use EssayPay to model structure and technique rather than outsourcing entirely. The nuances are subtle but telling.

Of course, no one denies the risks. There’s the moral tightrope, potential plagiarism issues, and a nagging feeling that the line between learning and outsourcing can blur. Yet the candid reflections you find in forums show a sophisticated calculus. A post from a London School of Economics student reads: “I use it to manage my workload, not to skip learning. I read everything before submission.” That subtle distinction is key — it’s not always black and white.

Even more revealing are the reflections about skill development. Some students claim that by studying the essays they purchase, they actually improve their own writing. It’s almost like using a personal tutor, except on demand and cheaper than tutoring services. That raises an eyebrow because it challenges conventional narratives: the service isn’t always the enemy of learning; sometimes it’s a scaffold.

And the conversation about ethics? That’s shifting, too. Professors are increasingly aware that students face pressures their syllabi never acknowledge. Discussions in academic conferences now sometimes touch on “academic outsourcing” as a coping mechanism rather than sheer laziness. A 2023 study from Stanford indicated that over 40% of undergraduates admitted to using some form of online writing assistance — and the conversation wasn’t scandalous; it was pragmatic.

So where does that leave us? There’s a paradox. Students crave authenticity in their work but also crave balance in their lives. EssayPay offers a negotiated solution: a way to reconcile high standards with human limits. It’s not perfect, and it shouldn’t be treated as a moral panacea, but its popularity is symptomatic of a larger reality — education, stress, and digital access collide in complex ways.

To wrap it up, consider this: a student at UCLA finishing an essay at 2 a.m., a full-time intern in San Francisco writing a report, and a philosophy major at Oxford juggling seminars — all are navigating pressures that traditional grading systems rarely accommodate. EssayPay, controversial though it is, becomes a mirror of those pressures. It’s less about the service itself and more about the ecosystem it reflects: one of time scarcity, mental health prioritization, and strategic thinking.

In the end, the conversation isn’t about cheating or morality. It’s about understanding why students make these choices and acknowledging that their reality is far more complicated than a simple A-F scale. And maybe, just maybe, by listening to them honestly, education can start to adapt instead of just judge.